October 29, 2009 / 6:10 p.m.
Posted by Alden Chiu,
University of Austin Student
Imagine you're on a routine trip to the grocery store: you park, shop and leave only to find your car and Spunky, the family Pomeranian, missing.
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)'s Uniform Crime Reports, a motor vehicle is stolen in the United States every 26.4 seconds. In addition, 1,095,769 motor vehicles were reported stolen in 2007.
A similar even happened to a woman in the South Valley, except in this case, she was robbed at gunpoint. Thanks to OnStar's new Stolen Vehicle Slowdown feature, the 100 mph pursuit was ended quickly and no one was hurt.
After OnStar pinpointed the location of the stolen vehicle, they waited for police to catch up. Then, they remotely put the vehicle to a complete stop. The robber ran, fell in a pool, and was arrested. Not the getaway he imagined I'm sure. With much success, this was the first time that the technology was implemented in real time.
This automated vehicle slowdown feature that OnStar is equipping in new 2009/2010 vehicles will undoubtedly help minimize traffic accidents, high speed pursuits, grand theft auto, and other automobile safety issues.
It’s not hard to imagine that this event will, if not already, spur a huge PR effort for the company.
If this technology gains more popularity in the future, it’s not hard to imagine that privacy issues may arise. Questions may surface as to what kind of conditions and or situations this technology can be implemented. I, on the other hand, believe that if you are a law-abiding citizen, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.
Obviously, this automated slowdown system has usefulness to both public and private industries, but which holds more precedence and are both able to coexist?
Personally, I believe law and government bodies will have more usefulness for this sort of technology in the long run. The two can exist together, but I would not be surprised if lawsuits arise in the dawning popularity this type of technology.
Let me know what you all think.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What issue do you think may arise? Like big brother stopping all cars with this technology? So far only cars with Onstar could possibly be affected right?
ReplyDeleteI fail to see a privacy issue but this is a cool new technology that should greatly reduce grand theft auto, at least for newer cars with this feature.
The issues that I address are speculations of the future with respect to consistent popularization of the technology. OnStar will not be the only system that will utilize it. Various private and probably public sectors and companies may endorse it as well. I can't think of a more fervent advocate in the use of automated-remote slowdowns than the very people who manage it everyday - the po po. At what point do you think every car on the road can be remotely stopped by proper officials to help reduce the aforementioned safety hazards. Who will oppose this sort of blunt intervention with kicking and screaming? Of course, I'm only speculating, but it's not hard to imagine.
ReplyDelete